Bromley Residents Divided Over Controversial Plan for 2,200 New Homes on Green Belt Land

Plans to construct 2,200 homes on green belt land in Bromley have ignited fierce opposition among local residents, with many labelling the initiative as “evil” and a project that threatens to destroy the local culture. One objector expressed feeling “physically sick” upon hearing about the proposal, while supporters highlight the need for over 1,000 affordable homes to address housing shortages in the borough.

Berkeley Homes initially unveiled its ambitious plans for the residential development surrounding Norman Park and Bromley Football Club last year, leading to significant public outcry. The developer submitted a planning application for the controversial Ravensbourne Place project to Bromley Council in early June. Since the full application became available to residents, nearly 2,000 individuals have voiced their opinions, predominantly in opposition to the project.

Local Opposition Grows

The proposed development has faced strong criticism from the community. A resident of Hayes for over 35 years described their overwhelming reaction to the proposal, stating they felt “completely overwhelmed and physically sick.” Another objector condemned the scheme as an “awful culture destroying project,” with various residents expressing concerns that it would exacerbate their quality of life. One individual succinctly urged: “Do not do this. You know it’s wrong.”

Another Bromley resident, living adjacent to the proposed site, condemned Ravensbourne Place as “a horrendous and evil destruction of our Bromley Borough prime green belt land,” threatening legal action against Berkeley Homes should the plans be approved. The primary concerns voiced by those against the project revolve around the destruction of green belt land and the pressure that an influx of 2,200 new homes would place on local infrastructure.

Environmental Concerns Raised

One passionate objector, concerned about the local wildlife, highlighted the Hayes Farm site as a vital habitat for both resident and migratory species. “The site is frequented by red kites, buzzards, badgers, foxes, owls, and large flocks of migratory geese,” they stated, emphasising the ecological diversity that would be compromised. The area also attracts wildlife photographers keen to capture its impressive butterfly and moth populations. This resident lamented the consideration of redeveloping such an environmentally significant space when numerous brownfield sites remain unused within Bromley.

Other residents echoed similar sentiments, arguing that the green belt provides essential leisure space for the community. One remarked on the detrimental impact of further urbanisation on climate change, particularly given the current heatwave conditions. “We are on our third heatwave this summer, and climate scientists warn this is the new normal,” they stated, asserting that green belt land should not be sacrificed for profit at the expense of public health and wellbeing.

Infrastructure and Traffic Woes

Concerns regarding the ability of Hayes to support the proposed development also feature prominently among objectors. Many believe that the area lacks the necessary resources, infrastructure, and services to accommodate such a significant increase in population. One resident stated, “My biggest concern is that such a huge project would create an unmanageable strain on essential services like water, sewage, electricity supply, and council services.”

Traffic congestion is another pressing issue, with one objector pointing out that Hayes has historically been a semi-rural village with limited capacity for development. The local roads, particularly Hayes Lane, are already congested, and the addition of 2,200 homes is likely to exacerbate these traffic issues. “During rush hour, it becomes incredibly difficult to navigate,” they noted, questioning how the local infrastructure could handle the expected surge in vehicle numbers.

Support for the Development

Despite the overwhelming negative feedback, Ravensbourne Place does have its supporters. Approximately 80 residents have expressed their backing for the housing initiative, citing a critical need for more homes in Bromley. Advocates favour the project’s emphasis on family homes and low-rise apartments over high-rise developments. Notably, half of the proposed homes are designated as affordable, a factor that many aspiring homeowners welcome.

One supporter shared their enthusiasm, stating, “My family has lived in Bromley for over six years and we are currently renting. This development could provide us with the opportunity to buy a property and stay in the borough we love.” Another echoed the sentiment, emphasising the pressing need for affordable housing for younger residents struggling to remain in the area due to rising property prices. “It is essential that the scheme retains the promise of 50% affordable homes, including affordable rent and shared ownership,” they added, expressing confidence in the project’s planning.

As the community continues to voice its opinions, the future of the Ravensbourne Place project remains uncertain. The ongoing debate highlights the complex balance between development needs and environmental preservation in Bromley.